“The bottom line is the BCS is flawed,” Shaw said. “They themselves know it, which is why they’ve proposed a lot of changes going forward. All I’ve heard all year is the computers don’t like Stanford. The computers haven’t programed themselves.”
Stanford, No. 4 in the AP poll, ranks sixth in the BCS and hosts No. 22 Notre Dame on Saturday night in the regular-season finale. Top-ranked LSU is undefeated and is followed by several one-loss teams, starting with Alabama and Arkansas.
Shaw said No. 5 Virginia Tech doesn’t belong ahead of the Cardinal (10-1, 8-1) because the Pac-12 is stronger than the Atlantic Coast Conference. He also contends No. 4 Oklahoma State doesn’t deserve a higher ranking because it lost 37-31 at unranked Iowa State—which he perceives as a worse defeat—in double overtime.
Stanford lost 53-30 at home to No. 10 Oregon.
“To have a one-loss Pac-12 team behind a one-loss ACC team means that the computer values the ACC more than it values the Pac-12, which I don’t believe is the case. I don’t believe that is accurate,” Shaw said. “You look at common opponents. Virginia Tech beat Duke by four. We beat them by 30. I keep hearing about quality wins, quality wins, quality wins. First off, who decides what the quality wins are? And secondly, how does a quality or non-quality loss effect people?”
“Oklahoma State is outstanding,” Shaw added. “They’re a very good football team. Once again, we lost to a team that’s in the top 10. They lost to a team that’s not ranked. I don’t get it. Not saying that where we should be as opposed to where other people are. I’m just saying the explanations that I get don’t make any sense.”
Join the club. The BCS has been one of the most debated topics in the nation since its inception.
by A.Gonzalez
No comments:
Post a Comment